India

Read the Main Article here - How India’s Founding Fathers Murdered a Civilisation For a longer list of some of our most influential founding fathers, with their thoughts and actions for/against hinduism, refer to - A list of the thoughts and actions of some our most influential Founding Fathers The following catalogues major government-led actions, laws or policies (in South and neighboring Asia) widely cited as targeting Hindus. Each item is supported by reliable sources; the focus is on concrete steps (legislation, official decrees, or physical acts by authorities) rather than rhetoric.

Read the Main Article here - How India’s Founding Fathers Murdered a Civilisation For a list of actions against the Hindu Society in entire Indian subcontinent, refer to - The Death of The Indian Subcontinent III. Hindu Reformers and Their Vision for Hinduism The 19th and early 20th centuries witnessed a significant wave of Hindu reform movements, driven by a desire to revitalize and redefine Hinduism in response to colonial critiques and internal social challenges.

TLDR - Summary: The Fundamental Thesis: India’s celebrated “founding fathers” were documented enemies of Hindu civilisation who systematically dismantled millennia-old cultural, legal, and spiritual foundations under the guise of modernisation and secularism. Key Culprits Exposed: Nehru: Self-proclaimed agnostic who declared he “cannot speak for Hindus” while governing them; architected Hindu Code Bills that legally demolished traditional Hindu society Gandhi: Created fraudulent “Sarva Dharma Sama Bhava” concept that imposed Islamic theological framework on Hindu thought; weaponised reform rhetoric to implant civilisational guilt Ambedkar: Openly called Vedas “worthless,” burned Manusmriti, advocated complete destruction of Hindu religious authority, and embedded anti-Hindu principles in the Constitution The Evidence:

TLDR - Executive Summary: Bengal’s transformation from the epicenter of Hindu nationalist awakening to communist stronghold represents a catastrophic constitutional paradox of civilizational proportions. The very region that produced Bankim Chandra Chatterjee’s Vande Mataram, Aurobindo Ghosh’s revolutionary spirituality, and the Jugantar secret societies—intellectual architects of Hindu constitutional thought—ultimately embraced an ideology fundamentally antithetical to its civilizational foundations. Key Timeline of Events: The Golden Epoch (1838-1920): Bengali intellectuals created sophisticated frameworks fusing Vedantic philosophy with militant nationalism; Chatterjee sanctified motherland-devotion as constitutional principle; Aurobindo transformed spiritual disciplines into revolutionary methodology; secret organizations operated as parallel governmental structures rooted in dharmic principles.

TLDR - Summary: India’s higher education system has become a parasitic institution that extracts money while providing minimal education. Engineering colleges can’t teach, graduates lack real skills despite having degrees, and society has normalized this dysfunction. We’ve created “educated-yet-ignorant” graduates who possess credentials but no competence, leading to massive resource waste and civilizational decline. The system survives through monopolistic control over degree distribution rather than educational quality.

TLDR - Summary: A mandatory competency examinations system could fix India’s education crisis: mandatory competency exams for all engineering graduates with small cash rewards for decent performance. Colleges whose students consistently fail would be shut down. This creates direct accountability between educational quality and institutional survival, forces colleges to actually teach, and eliminates thousands of worthless degree mills while concentrating resources on institutions that work. 1. A Promising Solution: The Universal Competency Assessment Model The path toward reform may lie in implementing a comprehensive accountability system through mandatory competency examinations—a “GATE Lite” approach that could fundamentally reshape the educational landscape.

TLDR - Summary: Analyzing recent market changes and reshaping industries and the human factors involved in it presents an economic complexity that goes beyond textbook theories. Competitive advantages are temporary - What seems permanent (like India’s IT dominance) can shift rapidly Monetary policy is as much psychology as economics - Expectations often matter more than fundamentals Perfect systems don’t exist - All economic frameworks involve trade-offs Money is a tool, not wealth - The goal should be facilitating productive exchange, not monetary purity Human behavior drives economic outcomes - Any system that ignores human psychology is doomed to fail The Great Outsourcing Shift: How Federal Reserve Policy is Reshaping Global Tech Markets Southeast Asia is emerging as the new frontier for IT outsourcing, with Vietnam and the Philippines positioning themselves as serious competitors to India’s long-standing dominance in the global services economy.

TLDR – Summary: There’s something peculiar about Indian history that most people don’t realize—until very late in the game, Indians simply never bothered chronicling their own story. Not in the way we think of history, anyway. While civilizations around the world were busy recording kings, battles, and political events, ancient India was doing something entirely different. Or perhaps more accurately, it was deliberately not doing what everyone else was doing.

TLDR – Summary: India’s secular democracy is critiqued for suppressing Hindu interests and fostering division, with historical evidence and intellectual arguments supporting a shift to a Dharmic governance model that prioritizes duty, justice, and cultural continuity while addressing concerns about majoritarianism. The Mirage of Secular Democracy in India: A Case for a Dharmic Renaissance India’s secular-democratic framework, enshrined in its Constitution since 1950, is often celebrated as a triumph of unity in diversity.

TLDR – Summary: Based on Joe Studwell’s How Asia Works, this article argues India skipped the “land → manufacturing → finance” formula that drove East Asian growth. East Asian model: Land reform boosted small-farm output, state-led export manufacturing forced global competition, and financial control funneled capital into industry. India’s detour: Post-1991 liberalization built an IT/BPO powerhouse (<1% workforce) instead of a broad manufacturing base (~14% vs. 30% in East Asia).